A person should be able to fight to not be admitted despite the fact they have psychiatric problems.
A person who is mentally ill can sometimes fight that involuntary commitment to a psychiatric ward in court. This is usually met with trying to convince the court that the person is not mentally ill. But what if they are, they should have the right to walk out of that courtroom with freedom as much as someone who would not mentally ill would have.
A person who is arguing to not be committed to a psychiatric hospital in court is usually fighting to convince the courts he or she is not mentally ill. A person should be able to have BPD, PTSD, and Schizophrenia and not face forced treatment.
People in the decision-making process are not trying to steer away from admitting someone into a psychiatric hospital because in their mind and they are helping the person. If a person does have mental problems problem they will be admitted and that is where the line is unfair.
A person can fight their case, however it is not similar to a criminal trial because of the fact the court feels they are helping the person which is fair if the person can prove he or she has no psychiatric disorders or isn't currently under distress.
A person should be able to fight to not be admitted despite the fact they have psychiatric problems and even be under distress and be able to win the case.
It should not be able if a person does, or does not have a psychiatric disorder, but having one , being under distress and not being treated in a psychiatric hospital. A person should have a right to be under distress but still allowed to have support and have freedom others have the right to have.